A patient suffers cardiac arrest while waiting in the exam room. An elderly visitor falls in the waiting room, is complaining of leg pain and is unable to get up. A diabetic staff member passes out from hypoglycemia. These are just a few examples of unexpected medical emergencies that could happen in a medical office.
Over the past few years, the landscape of medical malpractice insurance has seen various changes that cause increased premiums. The rise in premium cost has sparked debate among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and insurers alike. To understand why insurance rates are on the rise, it is crucial to unpack the range of factors that contribute to this complex issue.
Deciding to go from a private practice to a large group practice is a significant step in a podiatrist’s career. It's a decision laden with considerations, from professional growth opportunities to financial implications, and of course, your malpractice coverage. Here are some key points to consider from a professional liability insurance standpoint if you are planning to join a large group practice.
As a podiatrist, you have no doubt seen patients with wounds, masses, or lesions on their lower extremities. If these wounds, masses, or lesions are later found to be skin cancer, the treating podiatrist is at risk of a lawsuit. A common allegation in these cases is a delay in diagnoses and treatment of cancer resulting in harm to the patient. Skin cancer developing on the lower extremities is not uncommon and podiatric medical physicians are in a unique position to detect these types of cancers on their patients.
When a doctor does not refer a patient to a specialist for additional care, further diagnostics, or for treatment that only another physician can provide, they may be considered liable for negative consequences if the patient suffers as a result.
When a doctor does not provide a referral in time or at all, the patient may suffer serious complications, including:
If you prescribe opioids in your practice, it is important to be familiar with current clinical practice guidelines for prescribing opioids, DEA requirements, and federal and state laws and regulations to reduce your professional and administrative liability risk. In this article we will discuss some of the guidelines, requirements, and regulations relating to prescribing opioids.
Over the years, there have been many lawsuits filed against physicians because the patient was not satisfied with a surgical outcome. It could have been a post-operative complication, delayed healing, prolonged pain, cosmetically undesirable result, or a host of other reasons. In the majority of these cases, the physician was found to have acted within the standard of care and the case was eventually dropped or in the event the case went to trial, the jury found in favor of the physician. In the meantime, a lot of time, effort, money, frustration, and stress was spent on claims in which the medicine was good.
So, Why Do These Patients Sue?
This quote by S. Jay Jayasankar, MD is insightful, “The patient’s expectation, not ours, is the yardstick by which our patients measure the course of recovery, occurrence of complications, and the outcome.” If the patient’s expectations are not met, the patient is more apt to sue, regardless of whether malpractice occurred.
ACFAS 2024 Wrapped: PICA Provides DEI Scholarships, Dr. Ross Taubman Receives the Kenison Award, and More! Read below to check out all the ways PICA participated in the ACFAS annual conference!
Regardless of how long you've been practicing, you have undoubtedly come across a patient that has unrealistic expectations for surgery. This typically manifests in an unhappy post-operative patient. The patient may complain that their scar is too big, their recovery is taking too long, they are not able to return to work when they want, they cannot return to sports activities as quickly as they would like, they can’t wear stilettos, and the list goes on. And as we all know, an unhappy patient is more likely to file a lawsuit than a happy patient.